Why buy a
domain?
Well, this was a decision that was kind of made for
me. Yes, I did it, but it still kind of feels like
destiny. In June 2004 I realized that my hosting
plan for my original domain, IMOrca.nu, was much
much too expensive for what I was getting. My
original host had been taken over by an evil
corporate empire, which through its policies and
lack of customer support was actively hostile toward
independent (i.e. not business) hostees. I mean,
when the customer satisfaction survey doesn't even
include a place to mark that you aren't a business?
That should be a sign.
Soooo....I sought
another host. While recent events have made me
less than enthusiastic about recommending them to
others, I found that they were able to let me
host multiple domains on the same account. Oh,
wait...did you say multiple domains? Now, I'm an
organization freak. I mean, I make folders I don't
need just so I have them "in case", and so that all
of my sites have the same structure. I get bugged
when I forget and don't use the same naming
convention for files. It had always rankled a bit
that I didn't have project-dedicated domains...And
so I expanded. I like it here. Think I'll stay.
Which
management script?
So I said I was an organization freak, right? Well,
that's really what made my decision for me. I was,
like the majority of people at the time I started, going to use phpFanbase.
But to test it out, I decided to try the slightly
simplified "clique" version first. The thing that
bugged me the most was that to set up the kind of
structure I crave was not easy. To be really easy
to install, and to have the fewest steps for set up,
this script is set up to be placed all in one folder
with the regular page files. Ick! I
don't like that. I want the public files in
one place, and the functionality files in another.
When I tried to relocate things, I would get errors.
I even had trouble relocating the graphic files. I tracked down most of them, but it was a
pain, and I had a clutch of fanlistings to do all at
once. If I had to debug each one to satisfy my
organization neediness? Nope, not going to work
well. Now, if I were really cool and proficient
with php code and commands it would probably be very
simple. I'm not. And I hate bugging my husband the
programmer all the time to help me.
So...I started
shopping for other scripts. Enter Enthusiast!. I
had run across it at the My So-Called Life
fanlisting, and I will admit that it was the kinda
cute "powered by" graphic that first made me look.
Aha! A neat and tidy folder system built in? A
really excellent and well commented config file?
Sold! I knew it was for me when I didn't get a
single error on the first try. And I really like
the administration interface, too. Not to mention
that it follows more closely a file naming system
that I would have created were I cool enough to
create a script. Now, granted...I do like the
display options that phpFanbase offers (with the
possible exception that the numbers don't change if
there is an error or deletion). But I prefer the
backend set up of Enthusiast!. Personally I'm glad
there are several different scripts so that people
have a choice, but can still manage their sites with
ease.
Why branch
out?
Or, why do you have more than fls here? I kind
of like the idea of getting my toes wet in several
things. I like to experience different aspects
of this "listing" phenomenon. I decided I'd
try to open one of each type of listing I could. Try at least a little
bit in each community. Not gratuitously...they are
each things I care deeply about.
What to join?
Well, I honestly don't join listings for everything
I like. That's just silly. I typically will join
listings that:
-
Represent a
committed interest. So I won't join for my
current favorite song...but I'd join for a song
I loved in High School that I still love now.
-
Are pretty
unusual interests rather unique to me. So I
won't join the Orlando Bloom fanlisting (with
it's 10,000+ membership), but I would join a
fanlisting for sauerkraut, though I'd probably
be the only member.
Represent an
important moment in time, or an especially
memorable moment. So I won't be joining the
LOTR fanlistings, though I enjoyed the movies
and books greatly, but I would join a fanlisting
for Sting's "When We Dance," 'cause it was
played at my wedding for our first married dance
together.
Operate on
different levels. For example, I'd join a
musician fanlisting if I enjoyed their body of
work. I would be unlikely to join an album or
song fanlisting from that musician, then,
because I've covered them already. If I only
like few songs, I'd join the individual song
listings. Same goes for movies, books, tv, etc.
Now, there are
always exceptions. For example, I'm a member of HP
books and BTVS tv series (and so is everyone else on
the face of the internet practically), which are
clearly not unique to me, nor are they about a
really poignant moment in my life. But generally
that's how I think.
What to open?
To be honest, we all know it's way easier to join a
listing that someone else creates. So I'd really
prefer that other people host my interests. But I
consider running a fl both a service to the
community I like being part of, as well as being a
vehicle to express my own interests in expanded
format. I will generally consider opening a fl in
the following circumstances:
-
I'm
salivating over the thing right at that moment.
That's what happened with The Dead Zone
(TV). It's an immediacy thing.
-
I've been
waiting for someone to open the list I want to
join, and it's just not happening. That's why I
opened the one for The Name of The Rose.
-
I'm not a
collector - I mean, the largest of my fls has a
whopping 170 or so (can you see that under a
microscope?) - but I am interested in being part
of the phenomena that are popular (and that I
love, of course). So, for example, I did open a
Harry Potter related fl for "Floo Powder," and
I'd dearly love to own a Buffy listing (tho' I
refuse to run a repetitive or trivial one).
-
I'll consider
opening a listing if I think there's a niche not
being served.
Name: The Most
Frequently Asked Question
The name for this domain, "Scrumtrulescent," was taken from a serial
Saturday Night Live skit entitled "Inside the Actors' Studio," starring Will
Ferrell. The skit was a parody of the original show "Inside the
Actors' Studio" which was aired on the BRAVO network, and starred James
Lipton, who brought on actors to discuss their craft. On the SNL Skit,
Ferrell played Lipton, and his fictional guests parodied bit players and
has-beens that the faux-Lipton praises for their world-changing talent.
If memory serves, the word "scrumtrulescent" was first introduced in the
skit on the episode that aired April 7, 2001. In this installment,
Alec Balwin parodied Charles Nelson Reilly. Faux-Lipton is so
impressed by Reilly, that he can't express his love with conventional
vocabulary. He creates the word "scrumtrulescent" (which I don't
really know how to spell, and had to guess) to capture a depth of admiration
not possible in other words. When I purchased this domain, many of the
other obvious references to being a fan of something or loving something (_-phile,
_-lover, fantastic, fanatic, etc.) were already taken, and I also didn't
want to copy anyone. I thought of the skit I liked so well, and I
thought, "well, wouldn't your unrealistic fandom of these off the wall
topics cause you to describe them as scrumtrulescent?" Yeah, I thought
so.
"When one thinks of CNR, one's
mind goes right to Match Game. That show was delightful. No. No. It
was brilliant. No, no, no, no. There is no word to describe its perfection,
so I am forced to make one up. And I'm going to do so right now.
Scrumtrulescent."
Find information
on this skit
Find more
information on this skit
Link Here:
Please save
images to your own server, and link to:
http://scrumtrulescent.org